The defender managed to achieve return to the appeal of business on deliberate causing a little harm to health

As considered VS, in this case the decision on appeal complaints the defender in interests of the condemned and private accuser is not accepted the appeal, and is specified about leaving without satisfaction of appeal complaints condemned which in business is absent In "AG" comment the defender of the condemned noted that such violations meet infrequently and are in most cases ignored by vessels or regarded by them as insignificant and not affected outcome of the case. According to one of lawyers, conclusions of VS are reasonable, as the instruction the appeal that complaint condemned, instead of the defender was considered...