The expiration date goods differed from state contract conditions — courts did not find the reasons to terminate the transaction

The parties concluded the bargain on delivery means for disinfection according to demands of the customer. The contractor directed part of goods, but it did not accept: the residual expiration date of production was not such, as in contract. It explained that goods had the improved characteristics. For a moment deliveries their residual expiration date was more, than in contract. The customer made the decision on unilateral refusal from contracts as production which answers terms of transaction, did not put. Courts did not find the bases for its cancellation: - the parties defined production expiration dates in the form of concrete values. If at...