VS reminded that courts independently set limits of revision of acts by new consideration

He specified that when determining criteria of revision the balance between the principle of legal definiteness has to be observed and inadmissibility of existence of objectively wrong decisions One of experts of "AG" noticed that refusal in satisfaction of requirements about recognition of the invalid transaction on alienation of shares has a consequence asset leaving from the competitive mass of the debtor at non receipt of counter granting by it and in case of recognition of the transaction of an invalid share will be returned in the competitive weight that will lead to restoration of the rights of creditors. Another especially noted VS conclusion that...