VS counted inadmissible collecting from the rural teacher of social benefits on construction houses

The Supreme Court specified that the appeal did not consider socially significant nature of payments, received within the federal target program, and also lack of dishonesty and illegal behavior from the teacher Kak was noticed by one of lawyers, the Supreme Court once again reminded vessels that Russian Federation − the constitutional and social state, and in conditions when fixing of young specialists in rural areas is especially necessary for the state, the formalistic approach is inadmissible. The second noted importance of a conclusion of VS that deprivation of payments the young specialist who has not allowed the unfair...