Administration office of federal antimonopoly service of the Perm Territory recognized "daughters" of PUBLIC JOINT-STOCK COMPANY "T PLUS" Federal law of the Russian Federation of 26 July 2006 No. 135-FZ "On the Protection of Competition"

@ProPerm.Ru
Show original

The Perm OFAS recognized
of the Photo: City portal Perm "Properm.ru"
"Anti-monopolists" considered that actions of the organizations led to infringement of interests of inhabitants of Zakamsk.

Today, on August 10, Administration office of federal antimonopoly service of the Perm Territory passed the decision on the case of violation by the affiliated companies holdings PUBLIC JOINT-STOCK COMPANY "T PLUS" ( LLC "PSK" and JSC T Plus novye resheniya LLC "TNR" ) Federal law of the Russian Federation of 26 July 2006 No. 135-FZ "On the Protection of Competition".

the Reason for initiation of antimonopoly business became the single growth of a tariff for a heat supply in Kirovsky district Perm for 56,61% because of inclusion in its structure of cost of transportation of thermal energy through the intermediary — JSC T Plus novye resheniya LLC "TNR" ( LLC "TNR" ).

As the Association of condominiums reports to

"The Perm standard", during consideration of the case of OFAS established that "TNR" uses the property which was earlier belonging to the by the founder companies (PUBLIC JOINT-STOCK COMPANY "T PLUS" and "PSK") only nominally. "PSK" as "new decisions" have no specially trained personnel and the license for operation of dangerous production objects is engaged in operation and service of heating systems.

Association of condominiums "The Perm standard":

— the Commission of OFAS came to a conclusion that "TNR" involvement in a chain of a heat supply of inhabitants Kirovsky district was made in the absence of any economic, technological and optimizing prerequisites and led to infringement of interests of an uncertain circle of consumers.

In the press service of PUBLIC JOINT-STOCK COMPANY "T PLUS" the correspondent of City portal Perm "Properm.ru" was told that to them the decision of OFAS did not arrive yet. "A question of response to the decision of supervisory authority will be considered after we will receive all package of documents" — specified in companies.


Analysis
×