The sociologist Eric Fasen deciphers the concept "end of an era of an exception of the general rules of sex" to France because Polanski Roman refused presidency at a ceremony of delivery of the prestigious French film award "César". With the sociologist the journalist French daily newspaper "Mond" Clarissa Fabr.
"Today Polanski Roman refused to preside over an award ceremony because of protests of the feministic organizations which have accused him of rape of the 13-year minor in 1977. How you explain change of views in the French society?" - asked the interviewer.
"As the decision was declared by p Polanski Roman, "César's" academy could demand that it did not concede to pressure. But it would mean to close eyes to those changes which happened to France", - the sociologist answered.
"That it to understand p, it is necessary to refer to business Stross-Kan Dominique, - the sociologist reminds. - At that time I wrote that opposition of America "a sexual correctness", considering that it is necessary to connect public work and private life, "republican" France, inclined to divide them, became obsolete. This business marked "the end of an era of an exception of the general rules of sex".
"To France the 1970th sexual relations with minors not necessarily were tabooed, in any case, based on a consent", - the journalist specified.
"Certainly, our view of pedophilia considerably changed, but even in the 1970th years Polanski Roman pursued. So, it is difficult to refer to sexual freedom of that era to justify rape of the minor which did not agree to that to her gave to drink drugs without her permission. Today there is one argument: freedom of art. But the idea that creative people do not submit to the general rules of sex that sex is not a subject of policy and that France is a special world, consigned to the past", - Fasen argues.
"Even the Secretary of State France for Lorans Rossinyol's family designated p "shocking" that presidency at a ceremony of delivery of "César" is entrusted Polanski Roman, and in its support the Minister of Culture" acted, - noted the interviewer.
to"Conversations that there is, on the one hand, a free world of culture, and with another - protesting feminists, suggests an idea that the culture is not feministic and that the feminism does not have a place in culture", - the sociologist notes.
"Reaction such leads up to the point of absurdity logic according to which art avoids policy: it can be purely symbolical. To consider that art is torn off from the world, means to saw that bough on which it sits!" - the sociologist continues.
"Started the whole fight in social networks as if each camp has the truth", - added the interviewer. "I would tell p to
differently. The public space is not really democratic. It is through got by domination: it excludes. Twitter, Sotsialnaya set Facebook, etc. form public counterspace in which arguing eventually forces dominating public space to understand itself. Outcast speak: I too have the place on a media scene. Do not remove me for a role of passive public. I among actors", - argue Fasen.
"This new business Polanski Roman fits into a context where women can feel restrained in the rights, whether there is a speech about abortions, about Trump's sexist speeches to United States of America, about vote to Russian Federation under the law on cancellation of criminal penalty for domestic violence, etc." - the interviewer specifies.
"Next day after march of women on January 21 the context becomes important. Trump was elected thanks to voices of white men, despite his sexism - and for many even for its reason. If the culture world to France persistently says that to feminism not a place in the art world, in jury and in charts, and even then when it is a question of rape of minors, in that case it will undergo risk "bydlizirovatsya" and even "trampizirovatsya", - Fasen is sure.