and JSC "Elvis-Garant" (enters the business empire Roslichenko Alexander ) in the claim about dismantle of an unauthorized extension to car showroom came to the end with the conclusion of the settlement agreement. On Wednesday, September 7, the judge Arbitration court of Saratov region Bolshedvorskaya Helena stopped production on this business , having approved the agreement text in the following edition:
"the Respondent - JSC "Elvis-Garant" within 4 months from the moment of the approval of the present settlement agreement carrying out of a conduit of industrial water makes d of =700 mm which is under an extension to JSC "Elvis-Garant" - "Repair shop" on the land plot with cadastral number 64:48:040820:47 to the address: Saratov, to the ave. are 50 years of October, 116 "D" according to design technical documentation (conditions of connection of Municipal unitary production enterprise "Saratovvodokanal" No. 11/18512 of 24.11.2015) .
the Claimant - Municipality administration "Saratov" abandons the declared claim claims to JSC "Elvis-Garant" in full.
in case of emergencies on a disputable site of a conduit, before completion of works on its carrying out, the duty on their elimination is assigned to JSC Elvis-Garant . we Will remind em to p, proceedings No. A57-18852/2015 were initiated by arbitration court in the claim City administration, considered that unauthorized construction of an extension to car showroom is not simple in a security zone, and directly over a conduit with a diameter of 700 mm, violates the rights and interests of other persons protected by the law and creates threat of life and to health of citizens. In other words, in case of accident flooded. It would be difficult to liquidate consequences of state of emergency, considering that the capital extension to a motor show actually costs on the main conduit (In more detail in article" ELVIS IGRAET NA TRUBE "). during consideration of the case by the judge Bolshedvorskaya Helena appointed the examination which carrying out was entrusted to the expert Stepanov which candidate was presented by the party of the respondent. Earlier our agency expressed to p opinion that instead of checking legality and safety of construction of an extension in a security zone of a conduit, the court before the expert raised a question of compliance to operating construction norms and rules of finding of the conduit in a place of its bedding. No wonder that in spite of the fact that the conduit was laid long before extension construction to a motor show, the expert came to a conclusion what exactly the conduit arrangement concerning an extension (and not the reverse) does not meet town-planning standards and rules. our agency will tell p to About consequences of the concluded settlement agreement separately, but already now there are doubts in its performance: a) "to take out" a conduit from under and without dismantle of capital construction it is represented business technologically impossible (if, of course, not to lay new communications in other place, preserving old); b) what forces "Elvis" will fight against emergency elimination? ; c) how the actual transfer to "Elvis's" using of municipal property (conduit) with the subsequent concession of Municipal unitary production enterprise "Saratovvodokanal" fits in? Edition believes, what such settlement agreement could become result of corruption arrangement of officials of administration Saratov and "Elvis's" guides with full connivance (and, perhaps, participation? ) the staff of prosecutor's office Leninsky District, acting in matter in quality of the third party. Interests of supervising department in process were presented by the assistant prosecutor of the area Sivashov Dimitri Aleksandrovich (Sivashov Dimitri Aleksandrovich - known in Saratov region a judicial surname: Sivashov Alexander is the chairman Engels district district court Saratov region; Sivashov Dimitri - the judge of a judicial site No. 1 Voskresenskoe district). of
