to Get electorate it did not turn out, but cochairmen
"Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) goes to pieces. One of three party leaders, Boris Titov , suggested two other colleagues cochairmen to resign. Boris Titov, besides, considers that the Federal political council has to call extraordinary congress at which it is necessary to resolve an issue of change of structure of the management by "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause).
Differently, are predicted by Boris Titov, crash of party is inevitable, and the first birthday (soon to "Prada" year is executed) can become the last easily.
On Boris Titov leaves that three cochairmen act as characters of the known fable of Krylov — pull in different directions, leaving a party cart on a place. "Our short history shows: "triumvirate" does not work. Three cochairmen easily agree about what it is not necessary to do, but that it is necessary to do — so never and did not agree" — Boris Titov castigates colleagues.
it Means, what the short and brisk song "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) is sung?
Irina Khakamada: In party it appeared to business not too conveniently
Here that the ex-member of political council of Union of Right Forces — the predecessor "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) — Irina Khakamada thinks concerning the events .
of "joint venture": — Irina Khakamada why friction in "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) went?
— Two organizations — "Union of Right Forces" led by Gozman, and Public organization "Delovaya Russia" with Boris Titov — on origin roots, the purposes and work methods absolutely different. "Union of Right Forces" got used to be political force, even if comfortable, but with the ambitions. And Public organization "Delovaya Russia" with Boris Titov was lobbist public organization of representatives of medium business. She got used not to make political slogans, and accurately to lobby interests on decrease in taxes. Certainly, they were doomed to the conflict.
of "joint venture": — For what they united a year ago, on what they hoped?
— United because there was an instruction from above. The Kremlin decided to create something silent, right, comfortable, and to tear down other right organizations. Let weak, but all the same unpleasant. When "Union of Right Forces" and Public organization "Delovaya Russia" was felt by resources under such association, they decided that will occupy a niche of liberal manual opposition, and will pass in parliament. The pragmatic purpose, within manual democracy — for them.
of "joint venture": — But it did not develop b?
— it did not develop p while and. But at the Kremlin everything developed. They registered weak players — "Apple" and "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause), and now anybody cannot occupy this niche. At the Kremlin everything turns out.
of "joint venture": — But the purpose was — parliament. Why now when it is not reached yet, in party there is an internal split. Somehow would wait, and were engaged in sharing. Now that to divide?
— I Think, it is connected with that now there is a campaign for elections to Moscow City Duma. And those who in it participate — let did not register "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) and makes such statements.
of "joint venture": — That is it is a storm in a glass?
— Yes, because business goes to policy most often to solve the problems.
of "joint venture": — In your opinion, at "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) what way, and whether is it in general?
— Well, a way at them one. They will be aloof, being the registered party. And to fight who whom will draw: Public organization "Delovaya Russia", for example, without Boris Titov, or after all Gozman. That's all. But registration is therefore they will flutter.
of "joint venture": - But finally, you consider, there will be one leader?
— I Think and, with co-chairmanship at them it does not turn out yet. It in general seldom turns out.
Bogdanov Andrey: To win March elections — or obosr. tsya
"Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) and one of founders of party, formally rank-and-file member of its Moscow organization, the ex-candidate for president does not hurry to bury Russian Federation Bogdanov Andrey . Though considers that party it is necessary to rename in OMOO "PRAVAYA RUSSIA".
— I would not tell that the party comes to an end. There are many party members, the regional organizations — everything works and works. I would advise our cochairmen to cease to be engaged in douche by dirt of each other, and densely to participate in March elections. In March in regions passes many election campaigns in local parliaments. I consider, each cochairman should take myself on the region, to head lists, and to carry out to regional parliaments of deputies.
It will be the real business, on the one hand. With another — everyone will be able to show the electoral resource as far as people perceive it in regions. That on the basis of these results to apply for leadership in party, on leadership in the party list at State Duma elections-2011.
of "joint venture": — Why turned out, what on elections in Moscow City Duma it is not visible to party?
— Co-chairmen fought among themselves and did not agree. The Moscow organization unanimously offered the three. Each cochairman disagreed with its structure separately therefore the list did not go.
of "joint venture": — you consider b, the party will break through in State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation?
— I am confident by p in it. March elections will show it. If on them the party suffers defeat, cochairmen will be compelled to leave — at own will. So, I apologize, obosr … tsya and not to leave — will be lower than their advantage.
Alexei Makarkin: Capacity and electoral opportunities are very doubtful
We Alexei Makarkin asked to comment on a situation of the vice-president of the Center of political technologies:
— whether the party will die Soon — I do not know. The party can exist and in rather deplorable state. There are after all "Patrioty Rossii" (Patriots of Russia), "Apple". But electoral opportunities "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause), really, are very doubtful. From the very beginning there was incapacitated a design of three cochairmen.
Plus to that, was available a number of other bottlenecks. For example, in the Moscow office of party a key role Bogdanov Andrey, the former leader of Democratic party plays Russian Federation. At the majority of espeesovets, clearly, relations with it bad. Bogdanov Andrey was for them "spoiler" in 2007. But what to do if the Moscow office "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) are created on the basis of DPR? !
the Kremlin patronized "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause), as caused all these moments. For example, the Moscow office was organized in such a way, I think not to have even the situational coalitions with "orange". If it was necessary to make so that the party was not in vertical opposition — the task is executed. If the task of electoral results, political advance was set — with such structure it could not be executed.
the Same contradictions in a situation with Chichvarkin. The party, in principle, has to protect the. But at the same time, Chichvarkin is in the conflict to the state. And if the party is patronized by the Kremlin, the party cannot actively participate in protection.
Then, the fact that the Kremlin patronizes "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) does not mean that he refused the main political rates. And the main rate — is "Yedinaya Rossiya" (United Russia). When the cochairman "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) Boris Titov tried to affiliate "Business Russia" which he headed, with right, it practically lost at once the management in "DR". Because "DR" can be, on ideology of the Kremlin, is close only to "Yedinaya Rossiya" (United Russia).
the Kremlin has also the second party — "Spravedlivaya Rossiya" (A Just Russia). So if to speak about "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause), it in this turn only the third, and any exclusive rates on it did not become. By it allowed to be created, it was registered — but no more than that.
the party has even no immunity of removal from elections. Elections in Moscow City Duma showed it: seemingly system right removed as it is active, as stand-alone "Solidarity". And Chichvarkin's history showed that the businessman who was included into party leadership, has no immunity. And then what incentives for membership? ! to
it is clear to p, with such characteristics the party practically appeared at once in crisis. Ambitious regionals do not go to it. If to them did not get places in "Yedinaya Rossiya" (United Russia), they will do career through Social Revolutionaries, maybe, even through Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, but not through the right.
Ya at all I do not know p how to change a situation. If to enter institute of unity of the chairman, in party there will be a split. If to separate from the Kremlin, the party can lose even those weak opportunities which it has.
to Become p Medvedev's party — probably, such option would be possible if at "Pravoye delo" (Right Cause) was the electoral base. But it is not present.
our liberal community quite big. But his moderate representatives entered long ago "Yedinaya Rossiya" (United Russia). Radical are in stand-alone opposition. First of all — in "Solidarity". For them right — too pro-Kremlin project, whereas for moderated — insufficiently Kremlin. Similar processes and among potential voters.
Anyway, Medvedev will lean first of all on "Yedinaya Rossiya" (United Russia) which consolidated elite.
Right passed at us in the Duma only in 1999 when entered into the union with the Kremlin. The Kremlin needed to weaken as much as possible then The Fatherland — All <13> Russia block, and right received a maximum of opportunities in mass media. Now they have also no similarity of such opportunities.
Therefore party prospects quite doubtful.
Photo [