by the Speech about possible creation of specialized courts which would consider cases in the sphere of social networks and the digital right. Some kind of digital courts or tribunals for layka.
"In judicial system allocated earlier in the separate direction arbitration. In process of developments the digital right I allow also emergence of specialized institutions", - Dmitry Peskov told agency RIA Novosti news agency . The statement was heard in a lobby the World economic forum . Let's remind, past summer the area director "Young professionals" Agency strategic initiatives Dmitry Peskov (full the namesake of the press secretary of the president of the country) was appointed the head of state the special representative concerning digital and technological developments.
Today one of pressing questions of legal practice are punishments for husky and reposts on social networks. Without exaggeration any user Internet appeared in a risk zone as in practice it turns out that can blame for anything. Mass media report that in regions there are affairs even for kindling of intersexual discord. It not joke. In one region opened case on the male misogynist. In other - on the feminist abusing all men.
to Men, certainly, offensively to read posts of feminists. But the stronger sex, probably, can endure. From what suddenly law enforcement agencies began to protect the offended men, not really clearly. But it is possible to assume that someone hopes to receive new stars on shoulder straps, writing down feminists in extremist. As well with misogynists: if to start struggling seriously with this evil, colonies can not suffice, it is necessary to build the new. Whether so the state needs to go in this case for expenditure or, maybe, more important to look for problems?
"Me it seems to, it is now essentially important to look at that massif of affairs which at us appeared lately, and to separate where reposts and memes conducted to negative consequences, and where it was used to receive only layk, - Dmitry Peskov told. - I assume that in the future we in judicial system should develop specialized institutes which will accumulate the corresponding examination. It seems to me that how it occurs today, works not really effectively".
Many experts agree that one of basic problems - actions by time on the verge of an arbitrariness of those who draws up statements of examinations. These people, by the way, do not carry shoulder straps. The majority of them teach in higher education institutions, have scientific degrees. But they are authors sometimes the illiterate conclusions which usual prank admits extremism.
Meanwhile de jure the expert opinion - the proof for vessels. If the consequence shows examination in which it is specified, what in such husky or a repost the expert saw extremism, what decision court has to make? From the formal point of view for a conviction of it it is enough. Key to a solution - in creation of a network of competent, independent experts.
the Chairman of the board of Association lawyers Russia Vladimir Gruzdev agreed that the problem is." Practice on the affairs connected with accountability for placement of these or those materials in networks the Internet, certainly, demands improvement", - Vladimir Gruzdev told in conversation with the correspondent of website "Rossiyskaya gazeta".
thus the idea to create specialized Internet courts is not indisputable. In his opinion, probably, will enough develop specialization of certain judges and to create specialized structures within existing system of courts of law.
"Besides, can think of creation of specialized arbitration - non-state vessels within system of arbitration trial, - Vladimir Gruzdev speaks. - Such courts - information arbitration - could consider some disputes both physical, and legal entities concerning placement of this or that information. It is necessary to emphasize: affairs on extremism anyway remain in jurisdiction of the state vessels. But for some private disputes in the field of the information relations there can quite be an alternative system of trial - the pre-judicial procedures which are not excluding possibilities of judicial protection for the citizen who will disagree with the decision non-state information arbitration".